[SunRay-Users] VPN Performance

Ken Mandelberg km at mathcs.emory.edu
Wed Nov 11 01:28:02 EET 2009


We just started testing using Sunray 2's with the built in VPN support, 
running Easy VPN against a Cisco 5505. The performance level is 
disappointing. Even with the Sunray on the same 100mbit LAN with the 
Cisco's public port, I get utcapture numbers like

# TERMINALID      TIMESTAMP TOTAL PACKET   TOTAL LOSS   BYTES SENT 
PERCENT LOSS      LATENCY
00144fa80ecf 20091110173047       207446        55350    145037960
00144fa80ecf 20091110173302       223863        59449    156892372 
  49.445
00144fa80ecf 20091110173332       226171        59523    158986168 
   3.206
00144fa80ecf 20091110173447       239002        63446    167464254 
  44.676
00144fa80ecf 20091110173502       246927        67209    171753756 
  47.483
00144fa80ecf 20091110173602       254985        68677    178630044 
  34.639
00144fa80ecf 20091110173702       257126        68824    180463716 
   8.507


This is with just one active Sunray, doing some simple web browsing, no 
multimedia. Even a tiny multimedia window is really unusable.

Is this normal? If not where is the limitation? Is it the Sunray 
managing the tunnel, or the Cisco? Is there some tuning we are missing?

I had been using a Sunray 2 at home over cable modem, with a Solaris <> 
Solaris IPSEC tunnel provided by a workstation. That combo performs 
better over the internet, than the Sunray 2 does doing internal vpn 
against the Cisco directly on the lan.




More information about the SunRay-Users mailing list